References

Results Oriented Monitoring (ROM) reviews aim to assist the European Commission’s services and EU Delegations in monitoring of and reporting on EU financed development and cooperation projects and programmes in third countries through independent reviews of the progress of their implementation and the achievement of project results.

The evaluation covers all EU external action support to connectivity in the Enlargement and Neighbourhood regions between 2014 and 2022. It serves a dual purpose of accountability and learning. The main objectives are to: i) provide an independent and evidence-based assessment of the EU’s past and current external action support in the area of connectivity in the transport and energy sectors, and ii) based on this assessment, provide lessons learnt and recommendations for decision-makers at EU level to inform ongoing and future decision making.

The global objective of this evaluation was twofold. First, it aims to provide the relevant services of the European Union and interested stakeholders with an independent overall assessment of the performance of the "Investment Support to the Wadi Al Arab Water System II Project and EU support to the Water sector in Jordan," with a particular focus on the different levels of results measured against the expected objectives and the reasons behind these results. Second, the evaluation seeks to identify key lessons learned, draw conclusions, and offer related recommendations to inform decision makers on how to improve current and future interventions.

The objective of this facility is to enhance the overall quality of the actions under the NDICI Rapid Response pillar and the Peace, Stability and Conflict Prevention thematic pillar by providing high quality research services.

The global objective of this specific contract is to improve the European Union’s policies toward, and overall engagement with, Civil Society Organisations in Israel.

This global case study aims to provide an in-depth assessment of the collective response to the COVID-19 pandemic within the SIDS group of countries, with a focus on the extent to which the response efforts took into account the unique characteristics of SIDS and tailored the response accordingly. The case study covers the response to both direct and indirect impacts of the pandemic in SIDS, including efforts to support equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines, from January 2020 to December 2022.

This evaluation is a "mid-term evaluation" and covers the period from the start of intervention activities in 2017 until mid-2023 (30/06/2023). Its aim is to provide an independent analysis of the programme's performance, highlighting the qualitative and quantitative results in relation to the objectives. More specifically, it will assess the relevance of the intervention's focus areas in light of the results obtained. It will also verify the proper delivery of equipment (including destination, allocation, use, and associated training). Additionally, it will evaluate the intervention's performance in terms of the results achieved and the resources allocated, as well as the satisfaction of users of frontline health services. The recommendations aim to contribute to the reflection for the next strategic programming in the health sector and to inform future interventions by 2025/2026.

The end-term evaluation (ETE) of the Water and Sanitation Kigoma Region Project (WASKIRP) aimed to generate evidence-based findings that highlighted both the positive impacts and the added value of the project, while also identifying areas requiring further attention from the WASKIRP phase-out intervention team and the Enabel formulation teams.
Beyond assessing project performance, the evaluation provided actionable and realistic recommendations aligned with its objectives, serving as valuable guidance for future interventions in similar sectors. A key component of the evaluation was the extraction of lessons learned from both the project formulation and implementation phases, emphasising experiences—both positive and negative—that had influenced performance, results achievement, and impact generation.

The main objectives of this evaluation were to provide the relevant EU services and interested stakeholders with:

• An overall independent analysis of the performance of the Justice Sector Support Programme (JSSP), paying particular attention to its different levels of results in comparison with its expected objectives, and the reasons for these results;
• The main lessons, conclusions and recommendations arising from it in order to improve current and future interventions.

The objective of this assignment was to provide UNDP, national governments, and other key stakeholders with an independent assessment of the contributions of UNDP’s country programmes in Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan toward achieving national development priorities and the Sustainable Development Goals.
The evaluations aimed to:
i) assess, in both qualitative and quantitative terms, the relevance, coherence, efficiency, effectiveness, sustainability, and impact of UNDP’s programmes, including their alignment with national priorities and responsiveness to emerging needs;
ii) identify lessons learned and best practices, offering forward-looking recommendations to enhance the design and implementation of future UNDP Country Programme Documents.