References

This global case study aims to provide an in-depth assessment of the collective response to the COVID-19 pandemic within the SIDS group of countries, with a focus on the extent to which the response efforts took into account the unique characteristics of SIDS and tailored the response accordingly. The case study covers the response to both direct and indirect impacts of the pandemic in SIDS, including efforts to support equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines, from January 2020 to December 2022.

This evaluation is a "mid-term evaluation" and covers the period from the start of intervention activities in 2017 until mid-2023 (30/06/2023). Its aim is to provide an independent analysis of the programme's performance, highlighting the qualitative and quantitative results in relation to the objectives. More specifically, it will assess the relevance of the intervention's focus areas in light of the results obtained. It will also verify the proper delivery of equipment (including destination, allocation, use, and associated training). Additionally, it will evaluate the intervention's performance in terms of the results achieved and the resources allocated, as well as the satisfaction of users of frontline health services. The recommendations aim to contribute to the reflection for the next strategic programming in the health sector and to inform future interventions by 2025/2026.

The end-term evaluation (ETE) of the Water and Sanitation Kigoma Region Project (WASKIRP) aimed to generate evidence-based findings that highlighted both the positive impacts and the added value of the project, while also identifying areas requiring further attention from the WASKIRP phase-out intervention team and the Enabel formulation teams.
Beyond assessing project performance, the evaluation provided actionable and realistic recommendations aligned with its objectives, serving as valuable guidance for future interventions in similar sectors. A key component of the evaluation was the extraction of lessons learned from both the project formulation and implementation phases, emphasising experiences—both positive and negative—that had influenced performance, results achievement, and impact generation.

The main objectives of this evaluation were to provide the relevant EU services and interested stakeholders with:

• An overall independent analysis of the performance of the Justice Sector Support Programme (JSSP), paying particular attention to its different levels of results in comparison with its expected objectives, and the reasons for these results;
• The main lessons, conclusions and recommendations arising from it in order to improve current and future interventions.

The objective of this assignment was to provide UNDP, national governments, and other key stakeholders with an independent assessment of the contributions of UNDP’s country programmes in Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan toward achieving national development priorities and the Sustainable Development Goals.
The evaluations aimed to:
i) assess, in both qualitative and quantitative terms, the relevance, coherence, efficiency, effectiveness, sustainability, and impact of UNDP’s programmes, including their alignment with national priorities and responsiveness to emerging needs;
ii) identify lessons learned and best practices, offering forward-looking recommendations to enhance the design and implementation of future UNDP Country Programme Documents.

The project focused on improving access to Early Childhood Education for all children with a focus on vulnerable children: refugees and children with disabilities.
Particip managed a flexible short-term expert pool to contribute to all Outputs and to achieve defined indicators with the respective deliverables.

The overall objective of the assignment is to contribute to the implementation of a more coherent, impactful and strategic approach to DRR in the Philippines, including Climate Change Adaptation, by increasing the ability of international and domestic DRRM, climate and development institutions and instruments to work together in complementary and reinforcing ways for enhancing community resilience.

The evaluation seeks to assess the performance of the project FED/2019/408-193, measuring results against objectives, evaluating relevance, coherence, efficiency, effectiveness, sustainability and impact, and identifying lessons learnt, conclusions and related recommendations to revise the successor project 2024/455-047. The EU-Angola Dialogue Facility, approved in March 2019, aim at enhancing political cooperation and transversally supporting the implementation of policy priorities of Angola’s National Indicative Programme (NIP) 2014-2020, the National Development Plan (PND) 2018-2022, and the Joint Way Forward (JWF) recommendations. It further aims at reinforcing the capacity of Angola line ministries and contributing to better multisector coordination for more effective policy preparation and implementation.

The ongoing programme to support financial and administrative governance in Mauritania (PAGFAM) reflects the commitment of both the EU and Mauritania to support public finance reforms, in line with the European Union's Multiannual Indicative Programme (MIP-EU) 2021-2027, particularly Priority Area 3 - Governance, which focuses on economic governance and national public administration. The programme's overall objective is to enhance economic and administrative governance by promoting the reform of public finances and national administration, benefiting the various sectors that underpin public action.

General objective
The general objective of the action is to strengthen the communication of the European Union, on knowledge about the EU and on EU activities in Morocco, their challenges and their ambitions, to ensure better visibility and a greater commitment of the population in Morocco vis-à-vis the privileged partnership between the EU and the Kingdom.