References

The main objectives of this evaluation are to provide the relevant services of the European Union and the interested stakeholders with:

• an overall independent assessment of the past performance of the ‘Environmental Diplomacy in G7/G20’, paying particular attention to its results measured against its expected objectives; and the reasons underpinning such results;
• key lessons learned, conclusions and related recommendations in order to improve future Actions.

This project seeks to contribute to the improvement of economic, political and social inclusion of most disadvantaged youth in Tunisia by taking a local development approach in Tunisia and more specifically in the targeted regions.

The main objectives of this evaluation were to provide the relevant EU services and interested stakeholders with:

• An overall independent analysis of the performance of the Justice Sector Support Programme (JSSP), paying particular attention to its different levels of results compared to its expected objectives, and the reasons for these results;
• The main lessons learned, conclusions and recommendations to improve current and future interventions.

The main objectives of this evaluation were to provide the relevant services of the European Union, the interested stakeholders with:

• an overall independent assessment of the performance of the EU Initiative on Health Security, paying particular attention to its different levels of results measured against its expected objectives; and the reasons underpinning such results
• key lessons learned, conclusions and related recommendations in order to improve current and future interventions.

The objective of the assignment is assisting the European Delegation to the Republic of Macedonia in selecting the best-quality proposals (concept notes and full application) to be received in the frame of calls for proposals under the IPA Civil Society Programme 2021-2023.

The main objectives of this evaluation are to provide the relevant services of the European Union, the interested stakeholders and the wider public with:

• an overall independent assessment of the past performance of the “Cooperation on Competition in Asia”, paying particular attention to its results measured against its expected objectives; and the reasons underpinning such results;
• key lessons learned, conclusions and related recommendations in order to improve future Actions.

Two evaluations for the Government of Georgia and AFD:

• Mid-term evaluation of an AFD policy-based loan in the energy sector in Georgia. The evaluation focussed on the formulation of the policy-based loan and its effects on policy formulation and implementation (AFDTB_2022_CZZ1356_01).
• Joint ex-post evaluation of an AFD policy-based loan in the health and social welfare sectors in Georgia. AFD and Government of Georgia jointly carried out this ex-post evaluation. This evaluation assessed whether some areas of policy supported through the policy-based loan (PBL) resulted in the expected outcomes and linked the changes to the PBL (AFDTBI_2022_CZZ1356_01).

The overall objective of the project was to support third countries in building up their capacity to carry out RPBAs (Recovery and Peace-Building Assessments) and PDNAs (Post-Disaster Needs Assessments), through provision of technical expertise. Activities included deployment of experts in RPBA/PDNA missions, and provision of training and capacity building activities to national authorities and regional/international organizations, tripartite training events, as well as information sessions for EU entities.

The main task is to process the knowledge generated by the evaluations to precisely facilitate decision-making. The goals are:
- To improve evidence of effectiveness
- To enhance credibility of evaluation findings
- To gear project evaluations to new challenges

The main objectives of this evaluation were to provide the relevant EU services and interested stakeholders with

• An overall independent analysis of the performance of the intervention T05-EUTF-SAH-REG-13, with particular attention to its different levels of results compared to its intended objectives, and the reasons for these results.
• The resulting good practices, key lessons, conclusions and recommendations for improving future interventions.