References

The main objectives of this evaluation were to provide the relevant services of the European Union, the interested stakeholders and the wider public with:

• an overall independent assessment of the past performance of the project: Improving food and nutrition security in Dodoma and Singida Regions, Tanzania- Boresha Lishe, paying particular attention to its results measured against its expected objectives; and the reasons underpinning such results;
• key lessons learned, conclusions and related recommendations in order to improve future interventions.

The purpose of this evaluation was to build an evidence base regarding SDC’s engagement in climate change adaptation and mitigation, including partnerships established by SDC to address climate change adaptation and mitigation at global, regional and national level. The evaluation consisted in a backward and forward-looking analysis of SDC’s engagement in these areas. It aimed at identifying recommendations on how projects and programmes in Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation could be designed and implemented in the future.

The objective of the technical assistance is to provide support to the Ministry of Education in implementing the Qualitative Intervention Programme (QIP) through which the concept of "Positive Behaviour Support" (PBS) is being adapted to the Tunisian context and implemented.
The programme will allow to improve the quality of school climate and discipline in beneficiary schools, both factors that are expected to have a positive impact on the performance of students.

This final evaluation of the “Citizens' Empowerment in the Republic of Moldova” intervention was implemented between 28/12/2018 and 31/12/2021 with a budget of 4,900,000.00 EUR. The evaluation intended to contribute to i) accountability – by providing an assessment of the results achieved; and ii) learning – by understanding what have been the factors that made possible or created obstacles to the achievement of results and by identifying any key lessons that would lead to improved future Action in the region.
The evaluation team furthermore considered whether gender, environment and climate change were mainstreamed; the relevant SDGs and their interlinkages identified; the principle of Leave No-One Behind and the rights-based approach methodology followed in the identification/formulation documents and the extent to which they were reflected in the implementation of the Intervention, its governance and monitoring.

The overall objective of this project was to enable the EU to conduct independent and objective monitoring activities of EU Priority projects implemented in various regions in Somalia funded under the EUTF and the EDF funding instruments.
Furthermore, support was provided for identification and formulation of new EU programmes/projects and identification of sector wide linkages, achievements, lessons learned, recommendations to inform future programmes.rom

The main objectives of this evaluation were to provide the relevant services of the European Union with:

• an overall independent assessment of the performance of the project ‘UN Joint Programme to strengthen urban and rural resilience and conditions for community recovery in Syria’, paying particular attention both to its results, measured against its expected objectives, and to the reasons underpinning such results;
• key lessons learned, conclusions and related recommendations in order to improve the remaining period of implementation and potential second phase as well as similar future Interventions.

Support Peru in the domestic implementation of the Leticia Pact for the Amazon, addressing axes 1 and 3
of its action plan and strengthening the leadership of the second regional working group led by Peru.

The main objective of the assessment was to identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the management of Finnish development policy and cooperation and humanitarian assistance in view of the COVID-19 response, and to document them.

The purpose of the Election Expert Mission (EEM) was to collect and analyse factual information, assess and report on the electoral process against international commitments, standards and good practice for democratic elections in line with the criteria contained in the Commission Communication on Electoral Assistance and Observation.

The evaluation series was commissioned by the WFP School-based Programmes Unit in Rome and covered WFP emergency school feeding (ESF) programmes during 2015-2019. It encompassed four country-specific evaluations in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Lebanon, Niger and Syria, as well as a global synthesis report.
The findings were meant to strengthen the global evidence base on ESF and to inform future ESF policies and programmes.
All evaluations in this series used a mixed-method, theory-driven approach. The country-level evaluations were based on document review, interviews, focus groups, and large-scale field surveys (DRC, Lebanon).