References

The purpose of this evaluation was to build an evidence base regarding SDC’s engagement in climate change adaptation and mitigation, including partnerships established by SDC to address climate change adaptation and mitigation at global, regional and national level. The evaluation consisted in a backward and forward-looking analysis of SDC’s engagement in these areas. It aimed at identifying recommendations on how projects and programmes in Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation could be designed and implemented in the future.

The scope of the evaluations was to carry out an analysis and assessment of the relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability and impact of the two projects to guide MFA's future involvement in the identification, formulation, design, appraisal, funding and implementation of similar but more impactful projects.

The main objectives of this evaluation were to provide the relevant services of the European Union, the interested stakeholders and the wider public with:

• an overall independent assessment of the past performance of the project: Improving food and nutrition security in Dodoma and Singida Regions, Tanzania- Boresha Lishe, paying particular attention to its results measured against its expected objectives; and the reasons underpinning such results;
• key lessons learned, conclusions and related recommendations in order to improve future interventions.

The assignment took the basin perspective and looked at the transboundary governance mechanisms in place. Especially national level arrangements such as policies and Transboundary Water Management (TWM) units served the various transboundary mechanisms a country subscribes to at the same time.
The objective was to facilitate and document a joint review and learning process on provisions for transboundary cooperation in national policies and related institutional arrangements.

As a result of the February 2021 Coup d'état in Myanmar and the subsequent need to rethink the Finnish support to the peace and democratization efforts in the country, the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland (MFA) commissioned an assessment to provide inputs to its future programming in Myanmar. It assesses the achievements of five projects under the Finnish Peace Support Programme, including their ability to adapt to the post-coup situation, as well as provide inputs and recommendations for a continuous engagement in Myanmar. The assessment covers the three year period from 2019 to 2021.

The overall objective was to contribute to the implementation of the European Union's cooperation strategy with the Kingdom of Morocco in promoting sustainable and inclusive agricultural and forestry development.

The scope of this evaluation mission concerns the bilateral interventions of the PIC IV, executed by LuxDev:
SEN/031 – Health and social protection
SEN/032 – Vocational and technical training and employability

The overall objective of the assignment was to provide technical support to the EU Delegations for the implementation of the EIDHR Country Based Support Scheme (CBSS) for the period 2019-2020.

The objective of the technical assistance is to provide support to the Ministry of Education in implementing the Qualitative Intervention Programme (QIP) through which the concept of "Positive Behaviour Support" (PBS) is being adapted to the Tunisian context and implemented.
The programme will allow to improve the quality of school climate and discipline in beneficiary schools, both factors that are expected to have a positive impact on the performance of students.

This final evaluation of the “Citizens' Empowerment in the Republic of Moldova” intervention was implemented between 28/12/2018 and 31/12/2021 with a budget of 4,900,000.00 EUR. The evaluation intended to contribute to i) accountability – by providing an assessment of the results achieved; and ii) learning – by understanding what have been the factors that made possible or created obstacles to the achievement of results and by identifying any key lessons that would lead to improved future Action in the region.
The evaluation team furthermore considered whether gender, environment and climate change were mainstreamed; the relevant SDGs and their interlinkages identified; the principle of Leave No-One Behind and the rights-based approach methodology followed in the identification/formulation documents and the extent to which they were reflected in the implementation of the Intervention, its governance and monitoring.