References

The Joint End-Term-Review of i) EHA - Roll out the National Results Based Financing Policy in the Acholi Sub-Region and ii) LSF - Leveraging strategic health financing for Universal Health Coverage was commissioned by Enabel.
EHA and LSF aimed to contribute to Universal health coverage with focus on primary health care services in Tanzania. EHA runs from 2019 up to 2024, and covers the West Acholi region with a budget of EUR 9,7 million. LSF runs from 2021 up to 2024, and covers the West Acholi, Rwenzori and West Acholi regions with a budget of EUR 4 million.
The end-term review served the purposes of accountability, learning, and steering. It addressed the standard evaluation criteria, as well as cross-cutting issues. Qualitative primary data were mainly collected during a two-week field mission. The review also drew on documents and existing quantitative data.

The main objectives of this evaluation are to provide the relevant services of the European Union, the interested stakeholders with:

• An overall independent assessment of the performance of selected CT-P/CVE measures funded by FPI.2 during the years 2017-2022, paying particular attention to its different levels of results measured against its expected objectives; and the reasons underpinning such results
• As a particular approach to regional actions, a specific case study shall be carried out to assess the regional framework for support to CT-P/CVE measures in the Asian context, managed by the Regional Team in Bangkok. It is expected that the present evaluation assesses the relevance, added value and success of developing a model for CT and P/CVE actions, respectively, which have been replicated in different countries/contexts in Asia/Pacific (in Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Maldives for CT; and in Southeast Asia, Sri Lanka and Maldives for P/CVE). If deemed relevant, links can also be made to regional approaches in other RTs;
• Key lessons learned, conclusions and related recommendations in order to improve current and future interventions.

Field missions in: Maldives, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan, Albania, Jordan, Tunisia, Mozambique, Burkina Faso, Ivory Coast

The overall objective of this assignment was to contribute to improving the electoral and democratic framework of Malawi during the inter-election period and raising awareness and understanding of the EU EOM recommendations and technical issues related to their implementation.
In general, an EFM supports the consolidation of democracy, institution-building and democratic elections in Malawi in the context of the implementation of the 2019 EU EOM recommendations.

The members of the Sahel Alliance have chosen to concentrate their efforts in five priority sectors of intervention, in line with the development priorities established by the G5 Sahel countries: Agriculture, rural development and food security; Decentralisation and basic services; Education and youth employment; Energy; Governance.
The overall objective of this contract is to produce the 5-years Technical Report in line with the needs of the SA needs. In line with the commitments of the SA and its members, the Sahel Alliance Coordination Unit (UCA) plans to produce a SA 5 years results report in 2023.

The purpose of this evaluation was to assess the strategies and programmes of the African Development Bank (AfDB) in Djibouti and Mauritania. Its specific objectives were to take stock of the results achieved by the AfDB in Djibouti and Mauritania, to put them into perspective in relation to the resources deployed, and finally to identify lessons learned that could help the AfDB improve the effectiveness of its cooperation in these two countries. In line with the BDEV guidelines, the evaluation determined the relevance of the strategies and programmes adopted by the AfDB and set out in the CSPs, as well as their effectiveness, sustainability, efficiency and contribution to achieving the development objectives of each of the two countries concerned for the period 2011-2020.

The general objective of this service contract is to strengthen DG REFORM capacity of designing, monitoring, and evaluating projects.

This evaluation has two overarching objectives. Firstly, to analyse the extent to which and in which manner the support of the European Union (and of the European Commission in particular) has contributed to the overall political, economic and social development in North Macedonia in the period 2014-2020. And secondly, to identify key lessons and produce recommendations in order to inform decision makers on how to improve the current and future European Union's strategies, programmes and actions with regard to North Macedonia.

The overall objective of the project of which this contract is part is to support evaluation of the achieved results for activities implemented under specific projects implemented under indirect management and to identify the weaknesses in the implementation of activities as pre-condition for the long-term success of all EU funded activities.

This independent evaluation of the Corporate Emergency Evaluation of WFP’s Response in Myanmar assessed the appropriateness, effectiveness and efficiency of its emergency response in multiple crises in the country from 2017 to 2022.
The evaluation served the double purpose of providing: a) evidence and accountability (performance and result assessment) for results to WFP stakeholders; and b) provide learning (why certain results occurred or not, lessons and evidence for decision-making about a potential scale-up) on WFP’s performance in the Myanmar emergency context, specifically for developing WFP’s future engagement in Myanmar and for broader learning on WFP complex emergency responses.

The ultimate purpose of the forward-looking evaluation was two-fold. Firstly, it informed the MFA on the effectiveness, coherence and relevance of climate finance and what kind of results had been achieved with the various development policy and cooperation instruments over the period 2016-22. Secondly, the evaluation provided information and supports the implementation and further development of the Action Plan for Finland’s Public International Climate Finance to maximize the effectiveness and impact of Finland’s climate finance, especially regarding long-term planning and coordination of climate finance as a whole.