Nuestros proyectos

This independent evaluation of the WFP Country Strategic Plan in Bhutan assessed the strategic positionning, added-value and results of WFP operations in the country from 2018 to 2022.

The evaluation served the double purpose of accountability (performance and result assessment) and learning (why certain results occurred or not, lessons and evidence for decision-making). It is envisioned that the evaluation will inform the design of the new CSP for Bhutan, which was scheduled for Executive Board consideration in November 2023.

CSP key sectors and activities included:

• Emergency preparedness and response
• Nutrition and school feeding
• Social protection
• Agriculture value chains and smallholder farmer support
• Resilience, disaster risk reduction and management, and climate change
• Institutional capacity strengthening

Cross-cutting themes included: Gender equality and empowerment of women (GEEW), humanitarian principles and protection, accountability to affected populations (AAP), WFP partnership strategy.

The evaluation employed a mixed-method approach that triangulated qualitative and quantitative data from a variety of sources. For this purpose, the evaluation team conducted interviews with different stakeholders including WFP staff at HQ, regional and country level, WFP cooperating partners, donors, UN agencies, ministries as well as focus group discussions with the beneficiaries.

The final report is available at: https://www.wfp.org/publications/evaluation-bhutan-wfp-country-strategic-plan-2019-2023

The overall objective of the project is to provide technical support to the implementation and management of the 16 ENI CBC Programmes listed in the ENI CBC Programming Document.

The purposes of this contract are the following:

• to enable participating countries to manage and implement the ENI CBC Programmes in the most efficient way and to ensure effective cooperation between the Member States and the partner countries;
• to improve the project development and management capacity of organisations eligible to participate in the ENI CBC programmes – such as local and regional authorities, CSOs and other relevant players. These activities should benefit CBC partner countries (including Turkey and the Russian Federation).
• to stimulate coordination not only among ENI CBC programmes but also between ENI CBC programmes and other similar instruments. This would allow for exchanges of best practices among both Programmes and projects and increase the ENI CBC visibility.

Results achieved:

• ENI CBC programmes stakeholders will be able to share experiences and best practices with their counterparts in other ENI CBC programmes and with players involved in European Territorial Cooperation and in CBC programmes under the Instrument for pre-accession (IPA) where relevant;
• The Commission and the ENI CBC programme stakeholders will receive assistance to solve implementation problems;
• Studies and/or tools of general nature requested by the Commission or ENI CBC stakeholders will be carried out;
• Active networking among programme stakeholders will be established enabling them to share information, good management practices and to improve procedures.
• Level of awareness of cross-border and regional cooperation opportunities in the beneficiary regions will be increased;
• Visibility of the ENI CBC instrument will be strengthened;
• Coordination of ENI CBC instrument with other sources of funding will be increased,
• Partners capacity in CBC partner countries to identify and prepare good quality projects will be increased;
• Partners capacity in the CBC partner countries to manage local/regional development projects will be increased;
• Number of good quality projects prepared and approved for implementation will be increased.

This independent evaluation of WFP Country Strategic Plan (CSP) in Madagascar assessed the strategic positioning, added-value and results of WFP operations in the Country from 2019 to 2023.

The evaluation served the double purpose of accountability (performance and result assessment) and learning (why certain results occurred or not, lessons and evidence for decision-making). The evaluation was envisioned to inform the design of the new CSP for Madagascar, scheduled for Executive Board consideration in November 2023.

CSP key sectors and activities included:

• Emergency preparedness and response, including cash-based transfers
• Unconditional resource transfers to support access to food
• Malnutrition prevention activities
• Nutrition and school feeding
• Livelihoods activities, including smallholder farmer support
• Institutional capacity strengthening
• Logistics, supply chains and humanitarian aid coordination

Cross-cutting themes included: Gender equality and empowerment of women (GEEW), humanitarian principles and protection, accountability to affected populations (AAP), environment

The evaluation employed a mixed-method approach that triangulates qualitative and quantitative data from a variety of sources. For this purpose, the evaluation team conducted interviews with different stakeholders including WFP staff at HQ, regional and country level, WFP cooperating partners, donors, UN agencies, government entities as well as focus group discussions with the beneficiaries.

Link to the publication: https://www.wfp.org/publications/evaluation-madagascar-wfp-country-strategic-plan-2019-2023

The specific objectives were:

1. To ++raise awareness of EU's policies, principles and values in Uzbekistan++, notably in relation to the protection of the environment and climate action in the Aral Sea basin.

This was expected to be done through the organisation of a study visit to the Aral Sea region in order to:

i) disseminate information about the work being done by the Government and MPHSTF in the Aral Sea region;

ii) demonstrate a successful case that proves it possible to achieve significant and long-lasting results with limited funds;

iii) pave the way for future green investments and support to the region.

2. ++Provide assistance to the government of Uzbekistan++ in its efforts to mitigate negative effects of the Aral Sea disaster to the environment and population of Karakalpakstan.

3. Contribute to ++improvement of the ecosystem++ and ++sustainable life in the saline lands++ of the dried bottom of the Aral Sea by ++planting of 27 000 trees++ that are resistant to the climatic conditions of the region, such as ash, elm, catalpa, willow, saxaul, kandym, and others.

"Dialogue with Civil Society for Rights and Equality in the ENI Southern Neighbourhood" was a Technical Assistance Programme with the overall objective to strengthen the role of CSOs active at the regional scale, in building sustainable development, regional cohesion and resilience, as well as in influencing policymaking in the Southern Neighbourhood and the Euro-Mediterranean Space.

The specific objective was to strengthen the overall capacities and accountability of civil society organisations and facilitate their involvement so as to boost their contribution to the political and institutional framework at the regional level. This meant reinforcing the existing initiatives of support to CSOs in the Neighbourhood South, complemented with new elements, and to make CSOs efforts in the ENP South region more visible and structured. It aimed at enabling civil society to advocate and promote regional solutions to regional challenges, working jointly with governments, authorities and regional institutions while holding them to account.

Results:

1. Effective engagement with regional organisations and advance their agendas through policy dialogue.

2. Creation of regional thematic networks of CSOs.

3. Enhanced the capacities of Majalat, the regional hub of CSO on structured dialogue at regional level and with the EU Institutions.

4. Increased participation of young women and men in public life by expanding programmes for young civil society leaders.

5. Increased CSO contribution to developing resilience, defined in this instance as the capacity to resist adverse conditions, as well as contributing to stability at regional level by enabling CSOs to articulate their messages to regional authorities more effectively.

6. Support to EU Delegations in their engagement with civil society in partner countries provided.

Systematic and timely evaluation of its programmes and activities is an established priority of the European Commission.

The focus of evaluations is on the assessment of achievements, the quality and the results of Actions in the context of an evolving cooperation policy with an increasing emphasis on result-oriented approaches and the contribution towards EU foreign policy objectives and the implementation of the SDGs.

From this perspective, evaluations should look for evidence of why, whether or how these results are linked to the EU intervention and seek to identify the factors driving or hindering progress.

Evaluations should provide an understanding of the cause and effect links between: inputs and activities, and outputs, outcomes and impacts. Evaluations should serve accountability, decision making, learning and management purposes.

The FEMIP Trust Fund, launched in 2004, was set up to provide support to critical projects and more generally the economic development of the EU’s Southern Neighbourhood. The evaluation aimed to support the Assembly of Donors’ decision on the future of the Fund with solid evidence on the Fund’s performance and ongoing relevance, including in light of other similar instruments currently available.

The purpose of the evaluation was to determine the extent to which the FEMIP Trust Fund has helped to improve EIB operations in EU’s Southern Neighbourhood countries since its establishment. Particip analysed the functioning of the FEMIP Trust Fund, its decision-making process, its governance arrangement and its organisation, including a review of the portfolio of TA operations that were financed through the FEMIP Trust Fund.

The evaluation work encompassed the following main phases:

• Structuring phase: the evaluation team took ownership of the evaluation framework and approach, further amended and developed it where necessary.
• Data collection and analysis phase: this phase entailed a thorough desk review, data collection, validation and analysis. The analysis, focussing on 10 case studies of TA operations lead up to the drafting of the Evaluation Report
• Preparation of the final report: the Team Leader participated in the presentation of the evaluation’s emerging findings to IG/EV and to the Evaluation Reference Group. Based on the Feedback of the Reference Group, the Team Leader drafted and finalised the Evaluation Report under the guidance of IG/EV.

This Transaction Technical Assistance (TRTA) is provided to assist the Department of Higher Education, Research, Science and Technology (DHERST) to

• Design and prepare a project that will address key TVET challenges able to respond to labour market needs,
• Assess the technical suitability, economic, financial and social viability, capacity and institutional issues, gender issues and proposed actions, address environmental and social safeguards of the project; and
• Identify and implement selected measures to improve project implementation capacity of DHERST and other relevant government agencies.

The TA designs, undertakes due diligence and prepares project documentation for the future TVET project. The TA also assists in building the capacity of the government during their assignment, including implementing project management trainings and coaching as required.

The protection of DR Congo's protected areas requires a concomitant, coordinated and coherent effort to conserve nature within parks and improve the well-being of the population living in peripheral areas, through economic and social benefits. positive social issues. Within this context, the European Union and the DRC concluded a financing agreement to support action to contribute to the protection of the country's ecosystems.

The Coordination Unit of the NIP 11th EDF E&AD DRC Program was called upon to support the EDF National Authorizing Officer in the management of the activities foreseen by the financing agreement.

The ++overall objective++ of the project was to contribute to the protection and enhancement of the unique environmental capital of the DRC by increasing the positive economic benefits for the surrounding populations.

The++ specific objectives++ was:

• to increase the appropriation of the concerned administrations by feeding the reflection at national level with the lessons of the concrete experiences of the NIP 11th EDF Environment and Sustainable Agriculture.
• to ensure that the program is implemented in accordance with the objectives of the financing agreement.

The results to be achieved by the implementation of the project were the following:

• The Cell is set up and operational
• The integrated planning, monitoring, evaluation and decision support system (PME-DSS) of the NIP 11e EDF E-AD DRC Program is fully operational
• The Steering Committee of the Program Convention fully assumes the decision-making power devolved to it by the Financing Agreement
• The progress reports of the PIN 11e EDF E-AD DRC Program and other documents related to its implementation are prepared in a timely manner and submitted to the project owner and stakeholders
• Program achievements, lessons learned and good practices based on the experience of the program are made available to relevant stakeholders and may be integrated into sectoral policies
• The exchange of information between stakeholders, communication and visibility of the program are ensured.

This evaluation has two overarching objectives. Firstly, to provide the relevant external co-operation services of the European Union (EU) and the wider public with an overall independent assessment of the EU's cooperation with Ukraine between 2014 and 2020. And secondly, to identify key lessons and to produce recommendations in order to inform the responsible decision makers on how to improve the current and future strategies, programmes and actions of the EU in the country.

Its specific objectives are the following:

• To assess the performance (relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, coherence, impact, sustainability and EU added value) of EU support (policy dialogue and financial assistance); and
• To provide recommendations for the next programming period.

The evaluation pays particular attention to the areas of i) good governance, ii) economic sector reforms and iii) post-emergency conflict assistance. It is intended to lead to the identification of conclusions, lessons learnt (both positive and negative), good practices regarding the achievement of the EU’s support for Ukraine with a set of targeted and useful forward-looking recommendations for the improvement of the programming, assistance, and implementation of current EU interventions in the country.

The evaluation was terminated by the EU due to Russia's unprovoked invasion of Ukraine.