Nuestros proyectos

The ++overall objective++ of the TPM for primary health care (PHC) and secondary health care (SHC) at PHC/BPHS and SHC/EPHS facilities is to ++independently verify the implementation++ processes and outcomes achieved by the contracted Service Providers (SPs) in supported health facilities and service delivery points, including verification at the community level.

More specifically, Particip,

• Monitors Health Facility Functionality;
• Conducts HMIS Data and Community verification;
• Conducts Drug Procurement, Distribution and Storage Assessment;
• Monitors Quality of Care. In phase 2 this includes Quantified Quality Metrics (QQM) Approach, Minimum Standards of Services (MSS) and high-impact value interventions (HIVA)- specific monitoring.

Furthermore, focused assessments are carried out to verify that health workers received trainings provided by third parties. Assessments of training and protocols on gender-based violence are also conducted at EPHS facilities.

Main staff provided:

• Project Manager 275wds
• Technical Health Manager 275wds
• Technical Data Manager 275wds
• Human Resource Officer 275wds

Provincial Monrs 275wds

QA Manager 275wds

• Field Monitors 1,147wds
• Other administrative support 275wds

Under the 11th EDF, the European Commission has adopted the State Building Contract (SBC-II) adapted to the context of fragility, with a view to contributing to the implementation of key reforms in three priority areas:

• the modernisation of the administration
• public finance reform and
• education

The SBC-II programme aimed in particular to: a) support the strengthening of the governance of the Haitian state, through support for the State Reform Framework Programme (PCRE) and the modernisation of the civil service, b) improve the management of public finances, and in particular increase budgetary transparency and strengthen control and anti-corruption mechanisms, and c) target certain priority expenditures for the implementation of the national policy in the field of primary education.

The SBC-II programme was supported by this contract, and specifically by an awareness-raising and communication strategy to increase the visibility of the European Union's interventions in these areas and to strengthen the communication capacities of the actors involved in these reforms.

++General objective:++

Increase the visibility of the European Union's SBC-II budget support programme on the reforms undertaken by the Haitian State and ensure strong participation and involvement of the legislative power and civil society in the reform process.

++Results:++

• Result 1: The Haitian population and the European public are informed about the European Union's interventions in Haiti and perceive significant changes.
• Result 2: Communication and awareness-raising activities are implemented by the government and focus on the state, public finance and education reforms of the SBC-II programme in Haiti.
• Result 3: Civil society and representatives of the legislative and executive branches of government are made aware of good governance issues. They are better informed, equipped and involved in monitoring and citizen control of public action, and are therefore able to better inform the population. Good governance takes a central place in the public debate and becomes a national concern.

The evaluation of the EU-funded intervention "Strengthening Capability for Integrated Border Management in Lebanon – Phase III" aimed to provide an independent and systematic assessment of its performance against expected objectives and results. It evaluated the intervention’s relevance, coherence, efficiency, effectiveness, sustainability, and impact, while taking into account the added value provided by the EU. Particular focus was placed on understanding the factors that influenced progress, including the evolving political and economic challenges in Lebanon—most notably the economic crisis. The evaluation also examined the integration of gender equality, women’s empowerment, environmental and climate considerations, and adherence to the Human Rights-Based Approach and the principle of Leave No One Behind. The findings were intended to inform decision-making for future programming, ensuring accountability and optimising the intervention's potential impact.

This evaluation covered one intervention financed by the EU in the security sector, supporting the implementation of the Financing Decision “Promoting the rule of law, enhancing security and countering terrorism”, ENI 2018 / 041-154 – Component 1: Border Security and Management (BS&M). It aimed to assist national agencies in securing the country’s borders (land, airport, and sea) while facilitating trade, regular entries, and assistance to people in need of international protection. Specifically, the intervention sought to increase the effectiveness of Lebanon’s border management agencies in line with international and democratic norms through capacity-building programmes and the provision of equipment.

The technical assistance contributed to a more efficient implementation of EU resources in the Central African Republic and, as a result, improved the effectiveness, efficiency and impact of aid in order to increase its impact on the economic and social development, in line with the National Plan for Recovery and Peacebuilding in the Central African Republic (RCPCA 2017 - 2021) and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Through the institutional support to the National Authorising Officer (Component 1) and the Technical Cooperation Facility (FCT) (Component 2), the project aimed to:

• improve coordination and streamlining of aid (from the EDF, the Bêkou Fund or other donors);
• strengthen the monitoring of public policies through regular political dialogue and interface with technical ministries;
• support the National Authorising Officer Support Unit (CAONF) and the EU-funded project and program management teams;
• support the Minister of Economy, Planning and Cooperation in his leadership on the process of implementation of the RCPCA and the management of aid in the Central African Republic.

In addition, the Consortium managed a Programme Estimate in the "Private commissioned operations" mode amounting to 849,727.07 Euro.

++Global objective++

The global objective of the "Sustainability Pathways for EU-Brazil Business Ties" project is to strengthen the EU’s bilateral and multilateral engagement with Brazil on external impacts of EU Green Deal policies and regulatory frameworks with emphasis on the deforestation regulation.

++Specific objective(s)++

• Engage with key stakeholders in Brazil to enhance understanding of the objective and content of the identified regulations, with emphasis on regulation on deforestation and forest degradation;
• Gather key information and provide feedback to EU services in the development of their implementing tasks;
• Understand the social, economic and environmental impact of the identified regulations in Brazil;
• Identify gaps and opportunities in current regulations and practices in Brazil where further work would facilitate meeting EU requirements.

The global objective of this assignment was to support the EU Delegation in its efforts and activities with respect to EQ recovery support to Türkiye.

Specific objectives:

• to support the Delegation of the European Union to Turkiye (EU Delegation) in assessment of the impacts (damages and losses) caused by the earthquake;
• to support the EU Delegation in assessment of the needs for recovery and rehabilitation of the damages and losses caused by the earthquake;
• to support the EU Delegation in up-to-date situation analysis including assessment of the gaps for recovery and rehabilitation and prioritisation of them in light of the efforts already done/programmed by other national and international bodies;
• to support the EU Delegation for developing projects linked to earthquake recovery and reconstruction (if and when necessary);
• to support the EU Delegation for monitoring use of the EU Solidarity Fund;
• to support the EU Delegation in appraisal of the projects submitted for EU financing (if and when necessary);
• to support the EU Delegation in monitoring of the projects under implementation (if and when necessary);
• to support the EUD in developing DRR models for each sector;
• organise and deliver workshop/training to EUD and/or public authorities representatives on Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) and Earthquake recovery processes.

This project aimed to:

• facilitated the process on EU-Ukraine Association Agreement (AA) implementation, notably by creating flexible on-demand based instrument for addressing key elements of the AA implementation and legal approximation processes such as high-professional advisory to key stakeholders, high-quality legal translations, accurate legal drafting/compliance checks,efficient communication of tehe EUI/AA reforms at national and regional level and improving the professional legal and translation training in higher education institutions; and
• ensured support to the EUI/AA reforms on both national and regional level by means of efficient communication of government authorities of central and regional levels with their target audiences.

The purpose of this contract was to strengthen capacities for monitoring, data collection, data management and reporting through establishment of national environmental information system and monitoring network structure via following results:

Result 1: Development of National Environmental Information System (NEIS);

Result 2: Development of National Environmental Monitoring Network (NEMN) and

Result 3: Strengthening the capacity for implementation of NEIS and NEMN.

The specific objective was to support NEAR A2 in fulfilling its mandate of generating renewed capacity of Commission services to engage with each other and external partners, to develop trust and to rapidly put these new skills to use.

This was made possible through the yearly thematic networks/trainings meetings that were great opportunities for capacity building of EU staff at HQ and Delegations and were further registered in EU Learn.

The regular thematic networks trainings indeed gathered colleagues from headquarters and delegations, in order to present policy updates, share cooperation methodologies, programmes and best practices, discuss and address issues of common interest and thus enable Commission services to learn new tools for achieving effective results.

These trainings addressed policy-related analysis (e.g. gender analysis, do-no-harm and conflict-sensitivity analysis, but not exclusively) and design of assistance. This also included mainstreaming of crosscutting issues such as resilience, digitalization, gender, disabilities, civil society, and more broadly the human rights-based approach, as well as analysis of legislation, regulations and law enforcement, legislative gap analysis, etc.

This independant evaluation of WFP Country Strategic Plan (CSP) in Turkiye assessed the strategic positionning, added-value and results of WFP operations in the Country from 2018 to 2024.

The evaluation served the double purpose of accountability (performance and result assessment) and learning (why certain results occurred or not, lessons and evidence for decision-making). It is envisioned that the evaluation will inform the design of the new CSP for Turkiye, which is scheduled for Executive Board consideration in November 2025.

CSP key sectors and activities included:

• Emergency response and recovery, including cash-based transfers
• School feeding
• Livelihoods activities, including technical and vocational education and training
• Institutional capacity strengthening

Cross-cutting themes included: Gender equality and empowerment of women (GEEW), humanitarian principles and protection, accountability to affected populations (AAP), WFP partnership strategy

The evaluation employed a mixed-method approach that triangulated qualitative and quantitative data from a variety of sources. For this purpose, the evaluation team conducted interviews with different stakeholders including WFP staff at HQ, regional and country level, WFP cooperating partners, donors, UN agencies, government entities as well as focus group discussions with the beneficiaries.